![]() |
|
Spaces home 宜靜磊磊的兩人新世界PhotosProfileFriends | ![]() |
|
September 18 相片更新之前因為MSN Space空間不足
照片只上傳到去黃石公園的一半
回國後又沒喘息的 補data 辦口試 忙畢業到最近才稍微有空整理
現在更新到今年六月了
照片標題我有空會慢慢再加
想看的就先看看吧~ ;) September 09 我看新政府上台100天沒有想要長篇大論 隨便碎碎念一下我想到的東西
政治理念可能大家都不盡相同
不過這是我的版 不想看就別往下囉 ; )
首先在經濟方面
台灣股市觸底以來已經打過三四隻腳了
第一次是因為油價要一次漲足
我覺得這完全不干新政府屁事
前政府為了選舉 不正常的抑制油價超過半年
加上這半年國際原油大漲快50% (最近才掉下來)
我不知道那些在罵的人 你們還期望怎麼樣??
早點回歸市場機制就不會一次被這樣打擊啦
像最近每個禮拜調 不管調漲調降 也沒聽誰在繼續哭爸了
第二支腳是美國次貸風暴
可以說幾乎全球都受影響了
反對黨的立委再次抓到機會又是一陣猛批新政府無法救經濟
最近的一隻腳是上周大跌七百多點
只為了馬英九的一句633不是馬上做得到的
除了反對黨的立委常常藉著似是而非的論點抓到機會就是要打馬之外
我認為台灣人民的智識水準與民主素養也真的有待加強
馬英九在政見發表時就說得很清楚
國民所得到"2011年"要達到2萬美元 八年之內要到3萬
其他兩項我不記得他說要在四年還是八年之內做到
但是現在是怎樣? 執政100天就要說他跳票?!
大家也許對總統候選人的政見多快應該要兌現有不同看法
我的看法是四年 因為一任就是四年
沒人說下次會選你 你在那邊說八年才要達到幹嘛?
(當然一些長遠的重大建設或是施政方向例外)
所以我覺得這次馬英九該罵的是
他竟然講說2016年才會達到
(到底是誰告訴你你可以連任的阿?
不過換個角度 扁可以做8年我看不出馬為什麼不可以= =)
然後今天他只是重申633不是短程的目標
立委媒體就開始在那邊講什麼跳票跳票
股市也應聲而倒
這對我來說表示兩件事
一是台灣的媒體跟立委真的是亂源
明明很合理的事 卻被大肆渲染 製造社會的紛亂與不安
從邏輯想也知道633不可能100天達到 也沒人說過100天會做到
不要再為了政治影響經濟面了
二來台灣人民也沒什麼判斷力
股市常跟著消息面在走 難怪政治人物炒股都會賺
政策面來說 我認為新政府有照著選舉時提出的藍圖在走
包括擴大內需、政策鬆綁、兩岸開放等等
我也認為效果出來不會是一天兩天就有
更何況大環境那麼差
但是只要有繼續努力朝正確方向在做
大環境轉好時我們會先反彈的
再來講總統主管的兩岸外交
我認為新政府能夠快速兌現直航與開放觀光很不錯
但是主權意識真的不夠
尤其是最近說"兩岸不是國與國關係"
"中華民國台灣地區"等言論
我想已經壓到很多中間選民(較少族群色彩的背景)的底線了
就我來說好了
我的背景是7/8的外省+1/8的本省
在傳統國民黨家庭長大 (爺爺外公都是黨/軍背景)
會說自己是台灣人也是中國人 但是是就"民族"與"文化"的觀點來說
這點在待過國外之後已經有特別注意
我對外國人就會強調自己是台灣人 而且台灣不是中國的一部分
但我認為民族與文化的根源是不可抹煞的
我也為我們中華民國可以繼承五千年來的中華文化感到驕傲
但是 中華民國(ROC, Taiwan)不是中國 (PRC, China) 這是很清楚的
我了解目前的憲法 明言中華民國現處分治的階段
不過我認為大多數人早就認同我們已從
"中華民國在台灣"進化到"中華民國是台灣"了
這也是為什麼我支持修憲 修改不符合現狀的國家描述
以符合多數國民的族群認同
甚至是改國旗國號國歌 只要是在合法的手段下完成的
我其實也是非常的贊成
不過阿扁做八年都沒動了 我想馬也不會動的...
(聽說很多人想改叫台灣共和國,然後換中間有個番薯的綠旗子XD)
兩岸在分治以來 人民的生活文化已經有很顯著的差異
雖然當初我們認為不具正統性的共產黨政權奪去了大陸的統轄權
也就是奪去了我們中華民國初立國之地大部分的領土
但是認清現今全球的局勢 我們應該接受PRC是一個跟我們不同且獨立的國家
也是如此 中華民國跟中華人民共和國當然是兩個國家
除了治權分裂已久之外 大部分的人民也已經對各自領域產生國家認同
後面那句話我想我是講太滿了
我認為ROC跟PRC的人民很多都已經有點人格扭曲了
PRC的很多人認為我們台灣是他們的= =
我完全不懂他們憑哪一點覺得應該是這樣
而台灣島內也好不到哪去
有一小群人跟對岸的人一樣覺得大陸是我們的 (跟對岸的人一樣怪我懶得講)
剩下之中的超過一半一點認同中華民國就是台灣 (包括我)
最後的一部分認為台灣還沒有建國 (那你們的國籍是什麼?)
或是以為自己是台灣國 (不知道什麼時候有這國建國了?)
我想現在要是在不受外力的影響下來辦個國家認同公投
結果一定會非常有趣XD
以上這些也就是為什麼台灣在主權這個議題上總是很有得吵
不同政黨上台對兩岸政策會有不同走向
因為大家對國家認同根本沒共識嘛~~囧rz
離題太多了....
所以基於我的觀念
馬英九講那兩句話還是"太超過"了
我想如果他不正視島內人民多數的國家/族群認同感的話
他沒有那個機會做下一屆了
總結來說 雖然還有很大的進步空間
雖然有些政策成效也不是一下看的見
但是新政府100天的施政是符合我期待的
整體來說我們是朝著正面的方向在走
======================================
最後 以上都是我個人見解
我可以體會、理解與包容很多人不會同意這些看法:)
September 08 人生是絕對的孤獨寂寞記得在高中的時候讀過一篇文章 讓我印象非常深刻
大意是說 人活在世上 是絕對的孤獨寂寞
即使有親人朋友的陪伴
但是改變不了孤伶伶的來 孤伶伶的走的事實
越長越大之後
慢慢體會到 這樣的孤獨寂寞在心理的層次更深
沒有任何一個人 我是說任何一個
了解你所有的想法 對你有百分之百的認同
或最少是百分之百的願意了解與體諒(understanding)
人們總是用自己的方式跟標準 不斷的去judge另一個人
而像我這樣無法不去在意別人看法的人
注定是要比較脆弱
也不再相信"知己"這種角色
如果有人願意在每當你想訴說時都願意耐心傾聽
不會嫌累嫌煩嫌晚睡 我會說你已經非常幸運
人生總會走到像我面臨的這種交叉口
雖然努力很久之後 不能被完全肯定的感覺很無奈
雖無愧於心 卻也無法不在乎別人評價(我)
我只能說 這是種選擇
選擇你想過怎麼樣的人生
在事業、家庭、朋友與其他部份的人生 是有一條線
每個人都有 鬆緊程度各不相同
最少過去的七年 我對自己的人生很滿意
浸淫在生命科學研究的快樂中 訓練自己成為一個科學家 (還有很多要學)
繼續打籃球 認識很多很棒的學弟妹好戰友 一座座獎盃與一幕幕美好回憶
都是我最後閉上眼那刻 人生跑馬燈的精彩片段
到了地球的另一端 體驗而且愛上另一種生活與工作的環境、風格
與朋友們大多也還保持聯絡 深深覺得朋友真的是一輩子的事
最後 與心愛的人訂下終身 也多了好多新的家人 再也不覺得自己是那麼孤獨
而這些都是需要用心經營的
下個階段的人生 又是另外一回事了
好在還有一段時間好好的自己想一想 調整一下
隨著人再更成熟一點
我期許自己能坦然於自己的初衷與選擇
該做的就做 該改的就改 該放的就放
別再那麼在乎旁人的評價與認同 有些東西本不該強求
就算是最親近或最要好的親人與朋友
回想起來 曾經最喜歡的座右銘 都隱約的點醒我自己
--豈能盡如人意 但求無愧我心
--漸漸習慣了 喜歡的東西不能夠據為己有
要學會 不去在意... March 12 WNTer wonderland- Dr. Randall Moon's storyDr. Moon是我去年在美國的老闆,這是他剛發表在雜誌上的自傳性文章,講述他發現與研究Wnt pathway的起源與過程。 我覺得這種科學家的故事給我滿大的啟發,尤其是最後一段關於我們對基礎科學研究的態度,更是發人深省。在這邊與大家分享,強烈建議大家用心慢慢看完。:P
WNTer wonderland A developmental signal involved in tissue regeneration could be a target for cancer and Alzheimer therapies. By Randall Moon Oringin: TheScientist http://www.the-scientist.com/2008/3/1/34/1/ Development. Disease. Regeneration. Aging. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling cascade has provided enough surprises and insight to fill my career many times over. It all started with a hunch. Like many newly minted assistant professors, I was working on too many things at once, and I didn't want to abandon any of them. I couldn't resist trying just one more. During Christmas break in 1988, I stole back to the laboratory while most of my students were home for the holidays, and I injected scores of tadpole embryos with the RNA of a gene called INT-1 that had piqued my interest. It was one of those goofball experiments that you never expect to work. A friend of mine, Andy McMahon at the Roche Institute (and now at Harvard University) had been struggling to knock out the INT-1 gene in mice where it was known to cause mammary tumors. We wondered what would happen in the reverse situation - if we overexpressed the gene. We hypothesized that since the gene was expressed in the nervous system, then perhaps the embryos would develop with neural defects. I certainly wasn't expecting to come back the next day to find a hundred tadpoles with two heads. The forked spines of these embryos reminded me of a famous experiment that every developmental biologist knows by heart. In the 1920s, German Nobel laureate Hans Spemann transplanted sections of one embryo into another, creating a secondary embryonic axis and thus a double headed tadpole. He called the transplanted section the organizing center. What was remarkable was that it looked as if I had replicated the effect with a single gene - the INT-1 oncogene. It was clear that something really important had fallen into my lap. That very day I euthanized all the meandering projects in the lab (except for those that grad students depended on to finish their PhDs), and focused everyone on INT-1. Working closely with McMahon, we repeated and developed the finding. We eventually put together a manuscript describing the axis-inducing activity for INT-1 in vertebrate development. It was featured on the cover of Cell1 and the experiments were quickly repeated by many people in the field, either out of a sense of disbelief or just because they were so easy and exciting to do. Today INT-1 is called WNT-1. Researchers realized that INT-1 and the Wingless gene in fruit flies were the same, so they combined the names to WNT. In fact, an entire family of 19 Wnt glycoproteins has now been identified in mammals alone. Each of these glycoproteins is expressed in spatially and temporally restricted patterns in embryos and adults. We now know that the Wnts are secreted factors that activate multiple signaling pathways in cells by binding to receptors known as the Frizzled receptors, as well as to other transmembrane proteins. In the 20 years that followed that first experiment, others and I have tried to understand how Wnt operates. We have learned that the normal roles of Wnt signaling include control of cell proliferation, differentiation, and movements in a variety of contexts. We have discovered a tremendous amount about the mechanisms by which these Wnt pathways work, and what happens when they fail. Wnt signaling is altered in cancer, bone density diseases, familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (a retinal disease), inflammatory bowel disease, and other conditions. This raises the possibility of new therapeutics, and indeed a number of large and small companies now work on Wnt signaling as a target for therapies in a range of diseases. So, back to the two-headed tadpoles. Why do they form and what does this tell us about the normal roles of Wnt signaling in early development? Carolynn Larabell, David Kimelman, and I showed that in the first hours of normal development, components of the endogenous Wnt pathway, including β-catenin, move along microtubule tracks to the future dorsal side of the fertilized egg. These become operational and activate the homeobox genes that in turn tell the embryo where to form the Spemann or gastrula organizer. Thus there is a direct link between Wnt/ β-catenin signaling and gene expression in directing the embryo where to make its body axis. We showed that later in development the same Wnt signaling is involved in programming the different patterns of neural tissue as well as different patterns of mesodermal cell types. Wnt signaling is clearly important in an array of activities in development.
We and others used a range of model organisms to tease out the mechanisms by which Wnt pathways operate. It isn't difficult to determine the genes that were originally discovered in Drosophila: Fruit fly geneticists have a penchant for wacky names. The rest of us provided the gravitas! The first connections were made in the 1990's, when other researchers worked out that the Wnt pathway in Drosophila activates the function of the cytoplasmic protein called Dishevelled. Dishevelled functions upstream of Armadillo, which is called β-catenin in vertebrates. It was not clear how the product of the Shaggy gene (called Glycogen Synthetase Kinase-3, or just GSK-3, in vertebrates) worked; it was operating downstream of Dishevelled and upstream of Armadillo. Roel Nusse found that the Wnt receptor in flies was Frizzled, and a few months later (darn those slow reviewers!) we showed that this was also true for vertebrate Frizzled proteins. This gave us an outline of the pathway starting with a ligand, the Wnts, the receptors, the Frizzleds, and some of the cytoplasmic components that transduced the signal. More connections started to appear. Kimelman, a wonderful colleague at the University of Washington, and I thought that the GSK-3 and β-catenin proteins might interact to activate the Wnt pathway. Sure enough, when we injected frog eggs with β-catenin RNA, the double-headed phenotype reappeared. However, it was blocked by coinjection of GSK-3 RNA, suggesting that the genes were working antagonistically in vertebrates as they do in flies. The question was: How was this working? Kimelman and I suspected that GSK-3 might directly phosphorylate β-catenin to alter its function. To test this we mutated the site on β-catenin that we thought was most likely to be phosphorylated by GSK-3. Not only was this β-catenin not phosphorylated at normal endogenous levels, but it also accumulated to very high levels, first in the cytoplasm and subsequently in the nucleus. Nuclear accumulation resulted in a kind of hyperactive induction of the two-headed phenotype in frogs. 2 I believe that the publication of this work was a key paper for the field, for three reasons: It showed directly that GSK-3 phosphorylates β-catenin, that this phosphorylation regulates posttranslational stability, and that the Wnt pathway controls the accumulation of β-catenin in the nucleus. The first inkling that GSK-3-mediated phosphorylation might be relevant to medicine and not just frogs came from papers in Science and elsewhere showing that these same phosphorylation sites were often mutated in cancers such as melanoma. We realized that modulators of the Wnt pathways might have an important therapeutic application, and we immediately started to think about experiments that could demonstrate this in animals.
WNT in regeneration: By day one post-amputation (dpa), cells have migrated to cover the wound. By day two, the "regeneration blastema" - a pocket of progenitor cells that contains many of the signals that direct and repattern the regrowing fin - has formed at the end of each bone ray, and the fin starts to regrow. By 10dpa, the fin has finished regenerating and is the original size and pattern of the pre-amputation fin.
Since Wnts were important in embryonic cells, I wondered if they might also be important in the most undifferentiated cells of adults, namely stem or progenitor cells. In a chance meeting with Mickie Bhatia then at the Robarts Research Institute of the University of Western Ontario, we decided to undertake what seemed like a simple-minded experiment. It was the rough equivalent of a human bone-marrow or cord-blood transplant: Human blood stem cells were introduced into immunodeficient mice in the presence or absence of a GSK-3 inhibitor. The GSK-3 inhibitor turns on the Wnt pathway by preventing the inactivation of β-catenin by phosphorylation. The mice that received the GSK inhibitor were better able to reconstitute their immune systems, indicating that the Wnt pathway could have a positive impact on stem cell function.
That simple experiment convinced us that small molecules targeting Wnt and other signaling pathways could help patients. 3 Patients with various types of cancer undergo radiation or chemotherapy, followed by transplantation with bone-marrow stem cells or cord blood to replace the immune cells that were killed by the treatment along with the cancer cells. However, there aren't many stem cells in cord blood; in fact, when patients receive stem cells from two cords, their chances of survival increase greatly. Could GSK-3 blockers increase the efficiency of cord blood transplants, conserving this key resource? This idea, and the broader notion that developmental signaling pathways such as Wnts, Hedgehog, and Notch might be greatly untapped sources for therapies, led to the formation of Fate Therapeutics. Four colleagues and I started the company, with timely backing and great scientific insight from four venture capital companies lead by Arch Venture Capital in Seattle and Polaris based in Boston. One major goal is to discover drugs that regulate endogenous and transplanted stem and progenitor cells, as well as drugs that reprogram cells to adopt other fates. The company was launched in 2007, and is off to a great start with a pipeline of products in development and testing. Since Wnts were important in embryonic cells, I wondered if they might also be important in the most undifferentiated cells of adults, namely stem or progenitor cells.
While helping start the company was important to me, I wanted to keep investigating Wnt signaling in the lab with my students and postdocs. I still had many questions in my mind about how it worked. For example, Wnt signaling plays multiple important roles in embryos - could we identify further roles in adults? One possibility was regeneration, since that involves stem and progenitor cells, which we knew were sensitive to Wnts.
Cristi Stoick-Cooper, then a graduate student, took the project on and in an elegant series of experiments showed that the Wnt/ β-catenin pathway is central to regeneration in zebra-fish tails. 4 With help from Gilbert Weidinger, then a postdoc, she found that blocking Wnt signaling through β-catenin completely blocked regeneration. Conversely, enhancing β-catenin signaling enhanced regeneration. Another postdoc, Hitoshi Yokayama, found that hind limb regeneration in frog tadpoles also required Wnt signaling through β-catenin. Thus, Wnt signaling is necessary for regeneration, raising new possibilities for therapies in mammals. Of course, mammals have at best, a limited capacity to regrow limbs. Certain organs, such as the liver, do have some regenerative properties. We studied liver regeneration in mice and found that Wnt signaling through β-catenin was activated. These were exciting findings, among the first to show that Wnt signaling was key to control of tissue regeneration in mammals. The finding raised the possibility that the converse might also be true: If Wnts served a positive role in regenerative processes, might Wnt signaling be reduced in some degenerative diseases? The literature gave hints that Wnt signaling might be important in Alzheimer's disease. For example, GSK-3 activity levels are elevated in patients, but this was not tied to a definite genetic connection. A highly motivated Chilean postdoc, Giancarlo de Ferrari, decided to look for this missing link. 5 Aside from Frizzled, Wnt sometimes uses a coreceptor called LRP6 to initiate its signaling pathway. Giancarlo showed that a statistically significant number of patients with Alzheimer's disease had a single amino-acid change in the LRP6 protein. In some cells this change reduced its signaling ability as we had hypothesized. If Wnts served a positive role in regenerative processes, might Wnt signaling be reduced in some degenerative diseases
An interesting follow-up to this is that lithium chloride, an approved drug used to treat patients with bipolar disorder, inhibits GSK-3. As described above, the consequence of GSK-3 inhibition is activation of β-catenin. Could an increase in β-catenin by lithium treatment help protect neurons of patients predisposed to Alzheimer's? De Ferrari had some evidence to support this in rats from his PhD work. Nicely enough, recent data from other labs support this happening in humans. So I am hopeful that understanding Wnt signaling or at least GSK-3 inhibition might contribute to therapies for some patients with this horrible disease. We are working on drugs that might help the lithium to work better and at lower doses than are needed at present. For many, developmental biology - a field that often studies early development of fruit flies, worms, mice, sea urchins, fish, and frogs - seems like it should be on the top-ten list of stupid things on which to spend federal funds. However, many biotech companies, including Fate Therapeutics, are emerging, aiming to find ways to harness Wnt and other early developmental pathways for useful drugs. It looks like the investment by the National Institutes of Health in this field is going to pay off. I can only hope that politicians, and the public, begin to understand the importance of investing in basic research at nonfluctuating levels, which would encourage students to invest decades of their lives in training, so that the basic research of today will have major impact on therapies in the future. Certainly no one foresaw that studying flies and two-headed frogs would save lives, but we and others are convinced that this will happen, and we are dedicating our careers to making it a reality.我只能期盼政客與社會大眾開始了解基礎科學研究的重要性,並且儘可能的資助基礎科學研究。如此一來才能夠鼓勵青年學子們投資十數年青春來訓練自己 (大學到研究所),進而貢獻一己之力於科學研究。也才能使得今日的基礎研究成果,能夠成為未來人類對抗疾病的工具。 沒人會知道以往研究果蠅與青蛙發育的成果,竟能在今日成為對抗疾病、挽救人類性命的知識;但是我們從事科學研究的人卻從不曾懷疑,更進而投入我們的一生讓這一切可以成真。
Randall Moon is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at the University of Washington and director of the Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine. 1. A.P. McMahon, R.T. Moon, "Ectopic expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 in Xenopus embryos leads to duplication of the embryonic axis," Cell, 58:1075-84, 1989.
2. C. Yost et al., "The axis-inducing activity, stability, and subcellular distribution of beta-catenin is regulated in Xenopus embryos by glycogen synthase kinase 3," Genes Dev, 10:1443-54, 1996.
3. J.J. Trowbridge et al., "Glycogen synthase kinase-3 is an in vivo regulator of hematopoietic stem cell repopulation," Nat Med, 12:89-98, 2006.
4. C.L. Stoick-Cooper et al., "Distinct Wnt signaling pathways have opposing roles in appendage regeneration," Development, 134:479-89, 2007.
5. G.V. De Ferrari et al., "Common genetic variation within the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 and late-onset Alzheimer disease," Proc Natl Acad Sci, 104:9434-9, 2007.
January 14 回來之後的近況回來之後除了生活上一些雜事需要安頓之外
之前PAPER被REVISE的實驗花去我大部分的時間跟精力
週末常常只想在家休息 所以也沒什麼出去玩了 也沒照什麼像
最近轉貼了一些新聞
自己覺得年紀到了 身為中華民國 台灣的公民
雖然政治的亂象常常讓我們很失望 但是漠不關心絕對不是改善現況的方式
尤其是在國外待了一年之後 對台灣在國際上的現況跟地位
還有外國人是怎麼看我們的 有更深刻的認識
一回來也很無法適應台灣現今的社會風氣與亂象 還有生活環境的嚴苛
但是我不想就放棄自己長大稱為家鄉的地方 逃到國外假裝自己是外國人就算了
所以我覺得我們應該關心政治 關心社會 關心在這裡發生的大小事
立委剛選完 我自己解讀這樣的結果是人民對民陳水扁領導下的民進黨過去八年來執政不利的反應
我不覺得自己是反民進黨 或是所謂"泛藍"的選民
出國之後我比以前更認同許多民進黨一開始提出很多有理想性的憲政改革、台灣主體性相關的政策
至於所未關於台獨的議題 我會說如果沒有其他外力因素下 我會希望人家叫我們台灣
以台灣的名字加入國際組織等等
但是在那之前 我對目前自己的國家 也就是中華民國 是百分之百的認同的
希望人家可以以台灣稱呼我們 也跟我認為所有台灣大陸香港澳門(甚至加上部分新加坡馬來西亞印尼)的人都是中華民族的人不衝突
這個部份先講到這
今天我想舒發的是關於上週公投的結果
上周公投主要有討國民黨產跟反貪腐公投兩項議題
我自己因為反對執政黨用公投綁大選的方式進行選舉操作 以及這兩項議題都是假議題
根本不用問人民的意見政府也都該做的原因 拒領了公投票
雖然投票率結果兩項都是25%左右 但是沒有人可以判斷大家不投的原因
到底是像我一樣的原因 或是其他原因
專家把結果歸那為對民進黨失望以及回應國民黨拒領的訴求
所以推測那投票的25%應該就是相當於民進黨的政黨票基本盤 加上一些中間選民
結果十分有趣 討黨產公投的結果是有效票的百分之九十幾都是贊成
這很合理 如果公投跟大選分開我也是會投贊成
但是我最感到意外的是 反貪腐公投中贊成的只占有效票的一半出頭
也就是說有差不多一百多萬人反對我們應該要反貪腐.......!?
我一半驚訝一半失望 這暗示著台灣有一百多萬人只在乎今天要挺誰
而不在乎什麼是對的
也許還有其他解釋吧 我也希望我這樣想是錯的 August 29 瓶裝水的罪惡你喝不出來瓶裝水的罪惡,你喝不出來
作者:張楊乾(台達電子文教基金會數位媒體企劃專員) 6罐未開封的瓶裝水,整齊地排列在會議桌上,透明的瓶身加上白色的標籤,散發出一股極簡的時尚感。 會議正討論著企業間的碳排放交易,與會者陸續轉開了瓶蓋,尖銳的膠膜碎裂聲,像暗箭般在會議室裏四竄。兩個小時後會議結束,6瓶水中開了4瓶,開封的水全都沒有被喝完,喝剩的水一如往常地將被沖到下水道去。 這是再尋常不過的企業開會場景,瓶裝水不知自何時起,已成會議桌上的必要擺設。其實不只是企業,包括學術的研討會、議會的公聽會、政府的協調會、一直到學校的家長會,瓶裝水都是必然與會的貴賓。 但是,我們真的需要飲用瓶裝水嗎? 瓶裝水市場成長飛快 全球去年售出1億5000多萬噸的瓶裝水,若把水全倒在一起,需要3個澄清湖水庫才裝得下。而光是支撐這個產業,每年就必須消耗1800萬桶原油,以及1300多億加侖的水當原物料。 而以自來水生飲管線十分普及的美國為例,光是去年,平均每位美國人仍消耗了167罐的瓶裝各式飲料。其中關於瓶裝水的需求,在這30年來竟成長了20倍,超越了咖啡、啤酒等飲料,幾乎和碳酸飲品並駕齊驅。 不過,瓶裝水在美國熱賣,並不是因為這幾年美國缺水,純粹只是行銷手段的成功。像是Aquafina、Dasani、Perrier、Evian等這些大牌子,把瓶裝水塑造為健康、清新、甚至是時尚的象徵。像歌手凱莉米洛在巡迴演唱時,瓶裝水廠商甚至還出了一款紀念瓶。 追逐時尚,卻讓環境付出了代價。 每瓶水碳足跡驚人 生產1公升的瓶裝水罐,製程中至少需要17.5公升的水。瓶裝水出了生產線後,還需要運送、上架、冷藏等。根據估算,從歐洲運送1噸的Evian礦泉水到澳洲雪梨,會排出84公斤的二氧化碳,而光是去年,澳洲人就消費了1億5000萬公升的瓶裝水,等同排放了約1萬2000多噸的二氧化碳。 除了運送水會造成污染外,後續空瓶處理也是一大問題,在美國,使用過的塑膠瓶,最後只有2成被回收。這些講求設計美感的PET製品,最後多半是成為垃圾掩埋場裏,千年不壞的現代化石。 不過,喜愛喝瓶裝水的歐美先進國家,也不是完全不知反省,最近關於瓶裝水的論戰,就是先由美國開始。 包括紐約市長、舊金山市長、鹽湖城市長等,在參與6月舉辦的美國市長論壇時,就已經共同發表反對瓶裝水的立場。之後,紐約市還大作廣告,推銷城市自己的自來水。 此外,全美銷售第一的瓶裝水 Aquafina,在環保團體的壓力下,7月時公佈了瓶裝水的水源。結果環保團體竟發現,該牌瓶裝水內竟有24%是混著自來水,其他牌瓶裝水推估也有同樣情形。這可讓舊金山市市長紐森大為光火,立刻下令舊金山市政府開會時,不再另外提供瓶裝水。據估計,若舊金山的公僕以後通通改喝自來水,一年就可省下公帑1650萬新台幣,約可以支付3600多名學童的營養午餐! 回到台灣,我們對於瓶裝水的浪費程度,和美國相比不遑多讓。 台灣的自來水普及率超過9成,而台北市的自來水品質也已達到生飲標準,不過由於輸水管線及用戶端儲水設施多屬老舊,使得民眾對生飲自來水有疑慮。即使如此,在台灣因煮水或濾水的成本並不高,多數民眾不難取得乾淨的飲用水。 不過在此同時,市面上卻仍出現愈來愈多的瓶裝水,不論是天然的礦泉水,或是後天濾淨的包裝飲用水。現在瓶裝水更成了台灣的商機,像是當紅的海洋深層水、能量水、電解水,甚至連自來水公司,現在都打算出自己品牌的瓶裝水。 喝進這些水到底能不能延年益壽,目前還沒有案例能證實,但卻已有國際智庫警告,PET瓶恐怕會分解致癌物質到水裏。此外,瓶裝水從製造、運輸到掩埋,一生所產生的二氧化碳,也將為地球帶來暖化的惡果,這也直接關係到我們子孫的生存問題。 回收仍會對環境造成傷害 台灣的官員雖對外宣稱,我們的回收率已接近100%,每年大約回收了46億支寶特瓶,另帶來了約20億的再製商機。但這個數據也同時意味著,台灣人每人每年得為200支寶特瓶對環境造成的業障,一同付出代價。 國際瓶裝水組織,8月初時利用紐約時報和舊金山紀事報的版面,登廣告再三強調瓶裝水較一般飲料,如酒或可樂之類的飲品來得健康。他們認為,瓶裝水與自來水其實並沒有衝突的問題,全看消費者取決飲用何者較方便。 不過,在台灣,一罐最低價的瓶裝水需要18元,但同樣容量的自來水,卻連一塊錢都不到,消費者難道不能拿這中間的價差,去做其他對環境更友善的事?況且,全球有10億人其實連乾淨的水都喝不到,每天平均有3000位兒童因喝到受污染的水而死亡。如果瓶裝水真正是為人類的需求而生,應該是送去給這些需要水的地方,而不是在自來水普及的地區畫蛇添足。 瓶裝水陪伴我們度過了許多年頭,參與了各式會議、研討會、甚至是廟會等,但在了解到它背後所代表的龐大碳足跡,以及對資源的浪費後,也許是對瓶裝水說不的時候了。 至少,你該堅持,在能用自己的杯子,盛上一杯乾淨飲水的地方,就少開一罐瓶裝水吧! ※ 本文轉載自「台達環境電子報」 【相關網站】 | ||||||||||